1) That mature dating the price of decay was constant throughout time. 2). That the isotope abundances within the specimen dated haven’t been changed during its history by addition or elimination of either moms and dad or child isotopes 3) that whenever the stone first formed it included an understood amount of daughter product (“Radioisotopes and also the chronilogical age of the planet earth” pg v)
We should notice that processes that are past never be occurring after all today, and that some could have happened at prices and intensities far distinct from comparable procedures today. ( “Radioisotopes while the chronilogical age of the planet earth” pg vii)
God cursed the bottom (the stones too!)
See my commentary on Genesis 3 verse 17 “..cursed could be the ground for the benefit”
Whenever this took place there clearly was a burst of radioactity that made the stones look more than they certainly were.
Would not this make all of the stones look the same age?
“The rock real question is fairly easy and has now regarding the basic elements which constructed these stones at first. Whenever every one of these elements, uranium, potassium, radium etc. were started up, it can simply be normal in order for them to act in accordance with their properties that are individual ultimately acquiring stable half-lives of decay, at different prices. Suppose at first every radioactive element had been “exploded” into presence from pre-existent elements. None among these faster that is early will be the identical to they’ve been today.
As time progressed each would commence to get its slower modern-day stable half-life, but would all of them get these stable prices in a uniformity which will have them all in synchrony? We doubt it. You are right if they did, all would give the same ages. Each could possibly reach balance at different occuring times.
Check biological breakdown every-where, it proceeds at various prices. Glance at the globe from a viewpoint that is devolutionary observe how excellence is lost and breakdown has proceeded in spurts and stasis periods. Some people have lost more info than the others, this is exactly why some are at Harvard, but others, more regrettable, the exact same age have trouble with debilitating hereditary degenerative diseases like Lupus, MS, ALS, Crohn’s and lots of other diseases that are autoimmune. The secrets of that are locked within the “vault of degeneration knowledge” that evolutionists are reluctant to open up for fear that individuals creationists may be proper.” Jack Cuozzo 3/02
Carbon dates they did in contrast to
Carbon dating is generally an embarrassment to boffins. Check out Carbon 14 dates that have been refused since they failed to accept development
(then your web browser does not support tables – please email me for these dates if you do not see a chart below)
Antarctic seawater has a level that is low of. Consequently organisms residing there dated by C14 give many years much avove the age of their real age.
There are lots of more examples that I will include later on. However the people above provide you with a idea that is general.
There are more ways of dating. They too, offer varied results.
The potassium-argon technique ended up being accustomed date volcanic product in this example that is next.
Volcanic ash has additionally been recognized to offer times much over the age of they really had been .
Lava moves at Mt Ngauruhoe, brand new Zealand offered dates that are erroneousfrom K-Ar analyses) which range from
Has got the price of decay stayed constant?
The problem that is biggest with dating techniques could be the presumption that the price of decay has remained constant. There is absolutely no real method to show it. In fact there clearly was evidence that is much show this rate have not remained constant, and therefore it’s decaying faster and quicker. Exactly what the bible, and a Devolution and model that is degenerating of planet would anticipate.
a laugh about Dinosaurs and dating
Some tourists within the United states Museum of Natural History had been marveling during the dinosaur bones on display. One of these asked the guard, “Can I am told by you just how old the dinosaur bones are?”
The guard responded, “they have been 65 million, four years, and half a year old.”
“That’s an awfully precise quantity,” claims the tourist. “just how do you understand their age so precisely?”
The guard responded, “Well, the dinosaur bones had been sixty five million years old once I began working right here, and that had been four and a years that are half.”
Ahead this site to your family and friends
If you enjoyed this site, make sure to inform your buddies about any of it.
For those who have any concerns on Creation, Evolution, or want to say just “Hi” please do not hesitate to e-mail me personally.
Carbon dating sources:
1) From a movie Lecture by Dr. Kent Hovind
6)Antarctic Journal, Washington 10)”Dry bones along with other fossils” by Dr. Gary Parker